I was Kerio Personal Firewall user on my Windows XP system for many years but after change to Windows 7 I can't use it any more so I am looking for KPF. In PSC64 (Windows 7 64-bit): JPF v2.1. Carport Diagnose Lizenz Download Itunes on this page. 0.13.2471 scored 58% (-30%!), PFW v7.0.30.3 scored 88% (-10%). Last versions are: JPF v2.1.0.14.2481. Dvdinfopro hd 5 20 with keygen. Kids games pc ibizatorrent net. Easy forex software full cracked version. Jetico personal firewall 2 1 0 4with serial key. Sb proxy switcher pro ver. 5.3.1 build 5813. Red and gray theme for windows 7 pms. Arcania gothic 4 latest patch crack. Fsxfs2017 lionheart wittman tailwind build 1.3.

I was Kerio Personal Firewall user on my Windows XP system for many years but after change to Windows 7 I can't use it any more so I am looking for KPF replacement (preferably with built-in HIPS and learning option). Currently I am mostly looking at and - both are free to use, no longer updated and (as I read in many opinions) very good. JPF 'seems' a 'little more complicated' than PFW but I do not care about greater difficulty in learning curve and I am not afraid of 'many popups' as long as it comes to better security of my PC in the end. Career Switcher Program Va Gmu Parking here. There is also the question of updates for JPF/PFW - I know that they are maybe 'not so important' (Windows 7, the system I am using, is fully supported by both) but still. That's why I am also thinking about and - these are probably best 'still updated' firewalls I found - but they work in very different way as they are kind of 'overlays' for Windows build-in firewall. Are they worth to use? Are they better/worse than JPF/PFW?

After many days of reading opinions (also this forum) I can't still decide 'which one is better'. My main problem is that I can't find any 'direct comparison' from the user of JPF and PFW - only separate opinions from users of each of them. I would be very grateful for any feedback and opinions if you use or know any/all of these. Is using 'virtual PC' a good option to do some tests of these firewalls? I'm thinking about VMware Workstation Player or VirtualBox. Click to expand.Thank you for your response.

Can you be more precise why PFW is better for you? Is it more secure? Or is it just the matter of better interface? I found these two old tests of firewalls: and. According to their description: ' Proactive Security Challenge 64 is a replacement of former Proactive Security Challenge that tested security products on 32-bit Windows XP platform. Proactive Security Challenge 64 uses 64-bit Windows 7 platform.'

In PSC (Windows XP 32-bit): JPF v2.1.0.10.2451 scored 88%, PFW v7.0.25.4 scored 98%. In PSC64 (Windows 7 64-bit): JPF v2.1.0.13.2471 scored 58% (-30%!), PFW v7.0.30.3 scored 88% (-10%). Last versions are: JPF v2.1.0.14.2481 and PFW v7.0.30.3 - nothing big has changed since last test. For me it was quite surprising that JPF 'went down' so hard on Windows 7 64-bit, the platform I am using. Unfortunately, in 'detailed history' there isn't much about PFW, only about JPF: ' Jetico (.) suffers from its problems with 'indirect relativeness' protection which does work sometimes but could cause major headaches to its users in case of malware infection of the protected computer.'

As these tests (PSC64) were performed 3 years ago I do not know what should I think about them. JPF 'seems' to be much worse choice for Windows 7 64-bit at this moment - is it? Should I still trust these tests I linked above? Does somebody know any up-to-date one? : Thank you for your opinion. Yes, I'd like to have additional control over applications so I am taking your post as a vote for Privatefirewall (firewall with HIPS).

Can you tell me - have you ever tried Jetico Personal Firewall? I must say I'm quite impressed by JPF capabilities, especially after quite long reading of but it was definitely worth the time. Here is a handful of useful posts I've bookmarked for myself, just for reference and example: - How to,, and ruleset (by ) - (translated by, corrected by ) - (by ) My main problem is that all these posts are 10+ years old and (as I believe) relate to JPF v1 running on Windows XP x86. I also liked 's explanation posts but his last time online on this forum was a few years ago. The only 'up-to-date' ('4 years old') and interesting (related to my situation) post I've found is by - I wonder if is still using JPF?

Click to expand.Yes, I have learned a lot from the topic and 's examples and explanations I mentioned earlier. I think I'm quite ready to try this firewall, but there is a thing I'm afraid of - it is this Matousec test and 'low score' as it implies that all effort I put into understanding the logic of JPF may be not worth its trouble in the end which is quite opposite to what I feel and what you said (' Jetico v2 really is an excellent 3rd party firewall'). Do you know why it scored so 'low' under Windows 7 x64 (58%) vs Windows XP x86 (88%)? I've found this post. System Anomaly Detection This feature analyzes the normal use patterns of running applications and generates alerts as it detects unusual activity. The System Anomaly Detection Engine applies a sophisticated algorithm to establish a baseline of normal use based on several system variables such as CPU utilization, thread count, and others.